Today, I went to watch the first hour of the dress rehearsal
of Disappearance. I missed the first couple of minutes and was therefore
slightly confused throughout the performance but I tried my best to follow
along.
Before I attended the rehearsal, I
was skeptical of the use of multiple languages in the play. I did not really
know how it was going to be pulled off; I thought perhaps the multiple
languages would make it hard for the audience to understand the overall story.
However, for as long as I watched, I found the dialogue easy to follow since
each portion that was in a language other than English was immediately repeated
and clarified through the characters’ words and actions. While watching, I
wondered why some members of the cast were sitting on and behind the stage. I
figured that this was the portion of the play’s structure that was based upon
traditional Noh plays.
Now that I have sat through the
first hour of Disappearance, I am thoroughly intrigued by the storyline.
Before, I was unsure of whether or not I was going to attend the play, but now
I’m going to try my best to make time for it. Although I missed the first
portion, I still found it to be funny and engaging. I would really like to see
the rest of the play because I have begun to form predictions for the ending. I
think that there is something suspicious going on between the brothers and
their friend. It seems highly suspect that the younger brother is not in any of
the family pictures, that he has to take strange medications, and that without
the friend, it seems to be implied that he would not exist. My main question
is, did the friend “create” the younger brother? Is he some sort of
Frankenstein-like being that needs to be regulated to keep in working order?
Was he created as a companion for his lonely older brother?
No comments:
Post a Comment